Geotechnical injection – Systems
We developed a range of PU, acrylic and urea-silicate based injection resins, specifically designed for geotechnical injection.
Acrylic vs PU vs Urea Silicate-based injection grouts – differences
When it comes to various applications, different types of grouts have specific advantages. PU-based grouts are ideal for stabilizing soil, filling voids, and controlling water in fine-grained soils. In contrast, acrylic-based grouts are highly effective for filling voids and cracks in concrete and masonry structures, as well as controlling water and stabilizing soil in a wide range of soil conditions. Urea silicate-based grouts are most beneficial for soil stabilization and water control in cohesive soils, especially in high-flow environments.
PU-based grouts are based on polyurethane resin and are known for their high strength and elasticity. They are commonly used for water control, soil stabilization and void filling. PU-based grouts can also be used to create barriers to prevent the flow of contaminants. Our range of PU-based injection grouts is particularly effective for use in fine-grained soils and can be injected into tight spaces with low permeability.
Acrylic-based grouts are based on acrylic resin and are known for their ability to bond well with a wide range of surfaces. They are commonly used for filling voids and cracks in concrete and masonry structures. Acrylic-based grouts are also used for soil stabilization and water control. They are effective in a wide range of soil conditions, but are not recommended for use in high-flow environments.
Urea silicate-based grouts are based on urea and sodium silicate and are known for their ability to penetrate fine-grained soils. They are commonly used for soil stabilization and water control in cohesive soils. Urea silicate-based grouts are effective in environments with high water flow and can be used to stabilize soil slopes and prevent landslides.
